Search for: ""United States v. Booker" OR "543 U.S. 220""
Results 61 - 80
of 107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2014, 4:51 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 247 (2005), no circuit court has revisited the enforceability of appellate waivers. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:12 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), gives the district court ample authority to impose an appropriate sentence on remand. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:51 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), may finally be given the serious consideration it deserves. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 5:53 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), the Sentencing Guidelines were no longer “diktats. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), it is appropriate to require district courts to justify a deviation from the United States Sentencing Guidelines with a finding of extraordinary circumstances. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:36 am
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), particularly in light of the language in Justice Stevens' opinions at pages 240 and 278 and Justice Breyer's opinion in Booker at page 251. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:10 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 12:09 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), increases district judges' discretion. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 8:55 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:47 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and remand the case to the district court for resentencing. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 3:26 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), this Court held that mandatory application of the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). 07a0400p.06 2007/10/01 Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:54 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
One example of such a case was United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 11:40 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), 18 U.S.C. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:29 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) based upon the factors under 18 U.S.C. s 3553(a). [read post]
20 May 2008, 11:54 am
Of course, given departures and Booker variances, United States v. [read post]
