Search for: ""United States v. Mead Corp." OR "533 U.S. 218"" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am by David Strifling
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001); Iowa League of Cities v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm by Richard Hunt
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 228, 121 S.Ct. 2164, 150 L.Ed.2d 292 (2001), a case that does not support the Court’s position in any way. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 221 (2001) (holding that a Customs classification ruling “has no claim to judicial deference under Chevron” but can “claim respect according to its persuasiveness”). [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Richard Hunt
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218, 121 S.Ct. 2164, 150 L.Ed.2d 292 (2001). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), the Court has been scaling back. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am by Richard Renner
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]