Search for: ""United States v. Nixon" OR "418 U.S. 683""
Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2013, 6:36 pm by JaneAnne
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974), which requires that the information sought must be relevant, admissible and specific. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nixon (418 U.S. 683, 1974), holding (in the matter resulting from the Watergate scandal) that no person, not even the president of the United States, can be completely above the law, nor use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is “demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial. [read post]
21 May 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nixon (418 U.S. 683, 1974), holding (in the matter resulting from the Watergate scandal) that no person, not even the president of the United States, can be completely above the law, nor use executive privilege as an excuse to withhold evidence that is “demonstrably relevant in a criminal trial. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 6:06 pm by Andrew Frisch
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 709 (1974), the Court finds more persuasive the decisions of district courts that have declined to apply the self-critical analysis privilege. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 710 (1974). [read post]