Search for: ""Virginia v. Black" OR "538 U.S. 343"" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Black (538 U.S. 343), three defendants were convicted in two separate cases of violating a Virginia statute against cross burning. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:31 am
Black538 U.S.343 (2003), because it did not allege she subjectively intended to convey a threat to injure others” and (ii) that if § 875(c) “does not require subjective intent, the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Lee, 505 U.S. 672 (1992) (concluding that an airport is indeed a nonpublic forum); Children of the Rosary v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm by Karina Fuentes
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) required a subjective intent to threaten under the true threat exception to the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:11 pm by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003)—which struck down a provision of the Virginia cross burning statute that treated "any cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate"—was tantamount to a First Amendment requirement that "all communicative-threat laws" must "contain a subjective-threat element. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:48 am by mjpetro
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), for a lengthy discussion about the history of cross burning, especially by the KKK. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:06 am by Susan Brenner
Black, [538 U.S. 343 (2003),] publishing personal information of police officers does not have a `long and pernicious history as a signal of impending violence’ which would allow me to regard it as a `true threat. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Lyrissa Lidsky
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) for the proposition that "true threats" are an unprotected category, though whether this was an oversight or intentional, it is impossible to say. [read post]