Search for: "(f/n/u) Kennedy"
Results 81 - 93
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
(Id. at 585 n.18) Moreover, the majority discounted the Google-Sun negotiations, noting that a large part of the perceived value of a license was the ability to use the trademarked term “Java” (“branding and cooperation,” slip op. at 33), which Google had to forego when it decided not to license Java and instead to develop Android on its own. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
In National Assn of Broadcasters v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 7:45 pm
”“On February 6, 2008, upon entry into the United States to John F. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
The SG says that whether review is warranted “is a close question,” but “[o]n balance” the case warrants review to resolve a conflict between the Washington Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
We also consider the extent to which popular sovereignty can be constrained under the U,S, constitutional system.II. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The Court’s Rejection of the Physical Presence Rule in Quill Justice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court; writing for a majority that included Justices Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, and Gorsuch.[8] Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion in which Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 11:42 am
Romney said repeatedly what John F. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
Dunecrest Condominium Ass’n, 2021 WL 1930052 (N.D. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
., 917 F.2d 1574, 1583 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 401 n.13 (1993) (“[A] competency determination is necessary only when a court has reason to doubt the defendant’s competence. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
N. [read post]
