Search for: "*d U. S. v. Taylor"
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
If things went the wrong way, we’d be more likely to get into a U-Haul than to buy a gun. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
That understanding was shaken when I read Phil Dixon’s summary of United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
Taylor, 303 U. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Michael D. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-1366, would justify readers in feeling a bit of déjà vu all over again. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, (U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper, Working Paper No. 17-39 (Nov. 2017)).Ian S. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 4:58 pm
U. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:15 am
Council 82, AFSCME, AFL-CIO v New York Pub. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U Division A — Greco 2nd 20 B, F, P Division B — Myers 1st Floor 12 D, M, N, X, Y Division C — Farr 2nd 24 C, K, R Division D — Lefler 2nd 23 H, L, W Division E — Taylor 2nd… [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am
Glass Krakower LLP, New York(Bryan D. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Ellen Schrantz, Internet Ass’n: Robust success: the most fundamental point is that w/o that law there’d be no expeditious removal; you’d still have the task of removing content but you’d have to sue to get it down w/o 512. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The parties expressly agreed that the employees in the 250 positions, which were listed in an attached appendix, were "not assigned to any duties that would bring them within the definition of managerial and/or confidential under [Civil Service Law] §201.7(a)" and that the individuals in those positions "share[d] a general community of interest with other [s]tate employees in the P S and T [u]nit. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Cain, 14-10008 (seventh) asks questions about Brady and ineffective assistance of counsel; Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
You warm up to them easily hahah but can't talk to a guy that uve known for 7 years ... and were in a relationship and wanted to marry and start a family with ....again u said the above text that's why I'm say in this to you ....jus hurts that u ignore.Patel: YES! [read post]
