Search for: ". OD"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the revocation of the opposed patent by the Opposition Division (OD).Among other things, the patent proprietor complained that it had been deprived of the possibility to file further requests.The Board did not see things that way:*** Translation of the German original ***[2.4] The [patent proprietor] further criticised that the OD had terminated the proceedings although [the patent proprietor] had announced that it intended to file amended claims.However,… [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:26 pm
The OPs took place before an OD consisting of three members. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
Moreover, [the OD] – correctly – pointed out that the OD was unable of correcting this error itself. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 9:30 pm
To recap, representative claims revoked by the OD are as follows: 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 9:52 pm
While the headline decision of the OD to revoke the patent was delivered orally at the hearing on April 13, 2021, the OD has now provided its detailed reasoning behind... [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:06 am
However, the OD further observed, this is no longer the case.According to the OD, the sound applied for is simple, without complexity or distinction. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:03 am
In this case, the patent was maintained in amended form by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
The OD set a time period of 2 months for the parties to file observations. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the patent in amended form. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:01 pm
Remittal of the first auxiliary request to the OD[2.1] After having its first auxiliary request admitted into the appeal proceedings the [patent proprietor] requested the remittal of the case on the basis of this request to the OD for considering novelty and inventive step. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the revocation of an opposed patent by the Opposition Division (OD).The OD found in its decision that claim 1 according to then pending main and first auxiliary requests lacked clarity and that the subject-matter of independent claim 12 according to the then pending second auxiliary request lacked novelty, inter alia, over document D3.Before the Board, the patent proprietor filed a new main request corresponding to the second auxiliary request but which… [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
For sake of completeness the Board wishes to express its full agreement with the OD’s finding insofar as the current claim sets are not deemed to be belated even during opposition proceedings. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
The OD has given reasons for this decision. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, during the OPs, the OD refused to let Mr J. speak. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 12:00 pm
May today’s milestone (reported here) be also an ode to late professors Alegría Borrás and Julio González Campos for their absolute tireless efforts regarding the Spanish language at the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) and their infatuation with the Spanish language. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 8:02 am
Video: Cardozo Law Revue 2007 Beavis and Butt-for, an ode to Palsgraf. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 11:32 am
An ode to a law firm that survived it all in the crazy year that was 2020. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with an appeal against the revocation of the patent by the Opposition Division (OD). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:57 pm
Is this ode to Obama on the chopping block? [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus the principles developed in decision T 1002/92 did not apply to the case which the OD had to decide. [read post]
