Search for: ". OD"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal of the opponent after the patent had been maintained in amended form by the Opposition Division (OD).In what follows, the Board discusses the question of whether the ground of insufficiency of disclosure was already in the proceedings.*** Translation of the German original ***[2.1] In the present case the objection of the opponent regarding insufficient diclosure was discussed by both parties several times during the proceedings before the OD (see the minutes of… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:05 am
Shall I compare Brinker to a business game? [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 4:51 am
There's no question that we like it short and sweet in this country. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The [opponent], however, does not consider that its right to be heard was infringed by the OD. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:01 am
A statement to the same effect is also contained in item 6 of the section «Facts and Submissions» of the decision issued by the OD. [10] The board notes that the patentee, at the end of the OPs, after the OD had considered the main request and auxiliary request I then on file and had decided to revoke the patent and to close the proceedings, did not protest that the OD had not decided on the admissibility of auxiliary requests I to IV filed at the beginning of… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to revoke the opposed patent on the ground of insufficiency of disclosure.The OD argued that the therapeutic effect of the claimed vaccine had not been established. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The OD considers that the requirements of R 124(1) of those containing the essentials of the OPs and the relevant statements made by the parties are fulfilled. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
The right to be heard had thus been granted by the OD. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 10:12 am
An Ode to April 15! [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 10:12 am
An Ode to April 15! [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:36 pm
Image: ms_jd_photo_00515393.jpg February 2012 - Networking for the Soul: An Ode to My “Cosas” I am very much in love. [read post]
2 May 2009, 10:44 am
A Santa Barbara jury has awarded Oded and Anat Gottesman nearly $14 million in compensatory economic and non-economic damages for the loss of their child Yoni, who drowned in a Cathedral Oaks Athletic Club swimming pool in 2005. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 11:01 am
In its decison revoking the opposed patent, the Opposition Division (OD) found the main request (patent as granted) as well as the three auxiliary requests on file to lack inventive step.The Board did not agree and maintained the patent as granted. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm
The OD did not think so when it discussed the then first auxiliary request: [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The patent proprietor filed an appeal after the Opposition Division (OD) had maintained the opposed patent in amended form.After expiration of the time limit for filing an appeal, the opponent filed a “cross- appeal” (Anschlußbeschwerde) but he finally withdrew this appeal.The patent proprietor requested the Board to maintain the patent as granted. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:09 pm
“In an age where “software is eating the world”, what can we learn from the tool that has withstood the test of time? [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
” in claim 1 of the request found allowable by the OD. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 11:01 am
D7, D17 and D18 were already part of the procedure. [2.3] The Board does not see any reasons for deviating from the OD’s view. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal of the patent proprietor against the decision of the Opposition Division (OD) to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.Claim 1 of the main request before the Board was identical to claim 1 as granted and read (in English translation):A document of value (Wertdokument) having at least one authenticity feature in the form of a luminescent substance based on doped host lattices, characterized in that the host lattice is doped with at least one chromophore with the… [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
Therefore, the BoA has decided to have the [patent proprietor] bear only the costs incurred by [opponent II] for the additional OPs.[7.4] Pursuant to R 88(2) the OD shall, on request, fix the amount of costs to be paid. [read post]
