Search for: "40th Judicial District Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 11:45 am
The traditional deference to political decision making at the heart of the act remains respected--the scope of judicial review would remain both unchanged and left to judicial development in case law. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
§§1–1–113(1), 1–4–1101(1), 1–4–1201, 1–4–1203(2)(a), 1–4–1204 (2023).After a five-day trial, the state District Court found thatformer President Trump had “engaged in insurrection”within the meaning of Section 3, but nonetheless denied therespondents’ petition. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
[Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.] [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:06 pm
In the following Macomb County District Courts, a plea bargain with a disposition for a dismissal is feasible for first offenders charged with retail fraud 3rd degree: 37th District: Warren, Centerline 38th District: Eastpointe 39th District: Roseville, Fraser 40th District: St. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:44 pm
” Yet the seat ultimately went to someone else; Silberman instead was offered a seat as a district judge, which he declined. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 11:55 am
Since the state had recently redrawn its district lines, he filed to run in the 13th Congressional District this time. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
Members of the Electoral College aren’t federal officers, and they aren’t executive or judicial officers of a state. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:50 pm
Emergency Directive 1 requires that all superior and district court proceedings be scheduled or rescheduled for on or after June 1, 2020 unless: The proceeding will be conducted remotely; The proceeding is necessary to preserve the right to due process; The proceeding is for emergency relief; or The senior resident superior court judge, chief business court judge, or chief district court judge determines that the proceeding may be conducted under… [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:27 pm
Emergency Directive 1 requires that all superior court and district court proceedings be rescheduled for a date no sooner than June 1, 2020, unless: The proceeding will be conducted remotely; The proceeding is necessary to preserve the right to due process; The proceeding is for emergency relief; or The senior resident superior court judge, chief business court judge, or chief district court judge determines that the proceeding may be… [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:33 am
H.R. 1328, 40th Congress. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The District Court’s order only imposes a preliminary injunction, which the District Court could lift itself after further litigation, although that outcome seems relatively unlikely at present. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The District Court’s order only imposes a preliminary injunction, which the District Court could lift itself after further litigation, although that outcome seems relatively unlikely at present. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 6:42 am
The District Court’s order only imposes a preliminary injunction, which the District Court could lift itself after further litigation, although that outcome seems relatively unlikely at present. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 6:52 pm
However, the district court looked to the Supreme Court’s 1985 holding in Garcia v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 7:30 pm
The Roe Court itself noted a possible alternative ground for the right: without disapproval, it noted the district court had relied upon “the Ninth Amendment’s reservation of rights to the people,” in a passage that intimated that basis was reasonable and not unrelated to the Court’s interpretation of Fourteenth Amendment liberty. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:00 am
Indeed, a few months after Lawrence was announced, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court struck down that state’s law limiting civil marriage to same-sex couples. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Linda Greenhouse & Reva SiegelFor the Conference on Liberty/Equality: The View from Roe’s 40th and Lawrence’s 10th Anniversaries Can we really avoid conflict by avoiding courts? [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
It is a bit odd that much of the Court relies for its substantive due process analysis on the ideas of one who thinks the entire enterprise is illegitimate “judicial usurpation. [read post]
