Search for: "56 Associates LP"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
PUBLIC POLICY, WELLS FARGO'S WAY Two out of three justices on a panel of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston find no problem with blanket waiver of the statute of limitations defense along with all others (except payment) in a guaranty agreement. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
Energy Transfer LP In Allegheny County Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
The outcome was a vacating of the district court's grant of JMOL and a lot of discussion of drug "skinny labels": GlaxoSmithKline LLC and SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Ltd. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 11:26 am
Important: Each officer, director or partner exercising executive responsibility (or persons occupying a similar status or performing similar functions) or each person who owns 25% or more is presumed to be acting as an IAR or associated person. 6) I have an investment adviser representative who performs advisory services on behalf of my firm and is under my supervision. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
The Government presumably regards this as undesirable, although the relevant Explanatory Note (para.56) offers no assistance. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Trapp, 294 S.E.2d 446, 454-56 (W. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Associates First Capital Corp., 2001 WL 35948712, at *23 (D. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/18/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
JESSICA PARKER VALENTINE AND BRYAN L. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Actavis[18] and concurring in California Dental Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 6:36 am
Editor’s Note: Eduardo Gallardo is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Should internet publications be subject to pre-suit resolution? [read post]
