Search for: "A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 464
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2024, 8:22 am by admin
Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). [6] General Electric Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:50 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Evolv became a publicly traded company as a result of its July 21, 2021, merger with Newhold Investment Corp., a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC). [read post]
Insurers are also encouraged to analyze the various Proposed Circular’s expectations with an eye towards their existing policies and procedures for use of ECDIS and AIS, in order to identify potential gaps. [1] The Proposed Circular specifically exempts MIB Group, Inc. member information exchange service, a motor vehicle report, or a criminal search history from the definition of ECDIS. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Instead, Kraft Heinz implemented extreme cost-cutting measures that decimated its supply chain and innovation, allegedly harming critical relationships with vendors and customers. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, Content Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:56 am by David W.S. Lieberman
Health care includes care, services, or supplies including drugs and devices. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:58 pm by Richard West
Roadway was separated from its previous parent company, Roadway Services Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
In New York, specific personal jurisdiction is obtained through New York’s long-arm statute (CPLR 302).CPLR 302 (a) (1) states:“a court may exercise personal jurisdiction over any non-domiciliary… who… (1) transacts any business within the state or contracts anywhere to supply goods or services in the state. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:31 am by Hyland Hunt
Second, the court held (again, 2-1, with Judge Rao dissenting) that FERC did not adequately explain why the SEEM arrangement did not contain “discounted or special” transmission arrangements. [read post]