Search for: "A. D. B." Results 41 - 60 of 45,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2009, 2:04 am
In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73 “A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant [...] [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 4:54 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
Currently, Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(B) provides that A statement that meets the following conditions is not hearsay: (1) A Declarant-Witness’s Prior Statement. [read post]
  The statute under which Hastey was charged increases OUI from a Class D crime to Class B if the person has “a prior criminal homicide conviction involving or resulting from” operating under the influence or with an excessive alcohol level. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
And why think that the Supreme Court's ruling will apply only in the Section 2(d) context? [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 5:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  And this holding further expands B&B—if one can imagine limiting the registration in a way that avoids likely confusion, one should have done so already. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:54 am by scanner1
-B., JESSICA JEANNE JOHNSON, fka JESSICA JEANNE LAWRENCE, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:00 pm
White Castle System, Inc. 2023 IL 128004, in which the court held that the statute of limitations accrues with each scan or transmission of biometric identifiers or biometric information for claims arising under Sections 15(b) and 15(d) of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:05 am by David Lynn
The Northwestern Securities Regulation Institute kicked off yesterday with the Alan B. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 6:32 am by Callinan the Librarian
So . . . since my last post, I’ve been busy balancing. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
R v B and others: [2008] WLR (D) 296 “Where one of several defendants in the same criminal proceedings became unfit to stand trial before a jury had been empanelled there was nothing in principle to prevent a single empanelled jury subsequently proceeding to hear the trial of all the defendants, although in the case of the unfit defendant the jury would now be looking to the question whether he had committed the actus reus of the relevant offence. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:34 am
In re S-B (Children) (Care Proceedings: Standard of Proof) [2009] UKSC 17; [2009] WLR (D) 365 "The test to be applied to the identification of a potential perpetrator, out of a pool of two or more potential perpetrators, who might have caused harm to a child was the balance of probabilities and that standard of proof [...] [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:01 am
A leader of California's criminal defense bar, Susan B. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:52 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2) provides that A statement that meets the following conditions is not hearsay:.... [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:43 pm
The following documents are for the benefit of the creditors of Greater Atlanta Brokerage Solutions, LLC (d/b/a ReMax Greater Atlanta), Chapter 11 Case No. 11-60628 (N.D. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 2:51 pm by Andy Weisbecker
., doing business as B and D Foods, a Boise, Idaho establishment, is recalling approximately 33,500 pounds of fully cooked meat and poultry products due to possible contamination with Listeria monocytogenes, the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 9:41 pm by Patent Docs
Background This appeal arises from an inter partes review ("IPR") proceeding in which C&D Zodiac, Inc. [read post]