Search for: "AB 2" Results 81 - 100 of 4,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 10:30 am by Kerry Shapiro and Matthew Sanders
  Note the plural—under AB 1142 and SB 209, SMARA will now have (1) a process for financial assurance cost estimates (FACEs) for new or amended reclamation plans and (2) another process for annual FACE updates. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 10:27 am by Kerry Shapiro and Matthew Sanders
  Note the plural—under AB 1142 and SB 209, SMARA will now have (1) a process for financial assurance cost estimates (FACEs) for new or amended reclamation plans and (2) another process for annual FACE updates. [read post]
12 May 2016, 10:30 am by Kerry Shapiro and Matthew Sanders
  Note the plural—under AB 1142 and SB 209, SMARA will now have (1) a process for financial assurance cost estimates (FACEs) for new or amended reclamation plans and (2) another process for annual FACE updates. [read post]
25 May 2014, 6:02 am by Simon Lester
ADDED: And when I say, "which view do you take," that can be either:  (1) What is the law now (i.e., what did the AB have in mind); or (2) What should the law be. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:32 am by Rechtsanwalt
In einer der wichtigsten Entscheidungen des Strafsenats der BGH in diesem Jahre wurde das ungeschriebene Tatbestandsmerkmal der „Beutesicherungsabsicht“ in § 250 Abs. 2 Nr. 3 b StGB bestätigt (Az.: 2 StR 17/10). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:43 am by Kirk A. Hornbeck and Brandon Marvisi
”  The Court, however, held that AB 51’s accompanying enforcement mechanism that would impose criminal and civil sanctions on employers for violating AB 51 “directly conflicts with § 2 of the FAA” and is therefore preempted. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by CJ Haddick
  USLIC filed an answer and counterclaim seeking, among other things, (1) declaratory relief  (2) a finding that the insured violated the Pennsylvania Insurance Fraud Statute, and committed  common law fraud; (3) a finding that the insured breached the insuring agreement and (4) committed reverse bad faith. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 10:59 am by Anthony Zaller
Governor Newsom signed AB 257, termed the Fast Food Accountability and Standards Recovery Act or FAST Recovery Act, on Monday, September 5, 2022. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Folkert Graafsma
An underlying grouse in the allegations is that the AB is, at times, simply wrong, and that it is these “deeply flawed“[6] rulings that have landed the AB in the position it currently finds itself in. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:43 am by Simon Lester
  In paras. 209-215, the AB criticized the Panel's decision to (1) assume that Article XX applied and then (2) consider whether the measure fell under Article XX(a). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
The extent of ‘knowledge’ required to trigger the beginning of the relevant limitation period pursuant to s 11(4)(b) of the Act (interpreted in accordance with s 14 of the Act); 2. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am by Daniel West
The extent of ‘knowledge’ required to trigger the beginning of the relevant limitation period pursuant to s 11(4)(b) of the Act (interpreted in accordance with s 14 of the Act); 2. [read post]