Search for: "ABC, INC. (1-5)" Results 61 - 80 of 262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2020, 1:30 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” The ABC test referred to in this section of the Biden plan comes from the infamous A.B. 5 legislation that took effect in California on Jan. 1, 2020. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 12 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda… [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether the respondents should still be liable to pay non-domestic rates (‘NDR’) for periods when they leased their unoccupied properties to special purpose vehicle companies (‘SPVs’) on the basis that: (1) the leases were prearranged tax avoidance schemes and the relevant statute should be interpreted accordingly; or (2) the SPVs can be disregarded by a piercing of the corporate veil. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm by Bryn Miller
Assembly Bill 5 (“AB 5”) adopted the three-prong ABC test from Dynamex Operations W. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 13 October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of  R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has a report on the libel case of Chak Wing v ABC which is being heard in the Federal Court. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
  The state law, California Assembly Bill 2257 (AB2257) which Governor Newsom signed into law on September 4, 2020,  replaced Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which had codified California’s version of the so-called ABC test. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:03 am by Oliver Yee and Kelsey Cropper
AB 5, which went into effect January 1, 2020, codified in the Labor Code the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status that the California Supreme Court adopted in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:48 am by HRWatchdog
AB 2257 (Gonzalez) — Exemptions and Clarifications to AB 5 AB 2257 adds additional clarifications and exemptions to AB 5, a bill passed in 2019 that codified the Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 10:43 am by Rick Reyes
  AB-5, which went into effect on January 1, 2020, codified the California Supreme Court’s ABC Test for independent contractors as set forth in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
The office of the Australian Information Commission has also investigated Facebook over the scandal since April 2018 and hauled Facebook into the FCA on 9 March 2020.[1] The Commission alleged that Facebook Inc and Facebook Ireland breached s 13 G of the Privacy Act (Cth) from 12 March 2014 to 1 May 2015. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 1:42 am by UKSC Blog
On Wednesday 24 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 In this regard, the 5/5 Guidance states, As explained in prior guidance,1 HIPAA does not permit covered health care providers to give the media, including film crews, access to any areas of their facilities where patients’ PHI will be accessible in any form (e.g., written, electronic, oral, or other visual or audio form), without first obtaining a written HIPAA authorization from each patient whose PHI would be accessible to the media. 2 Additionally, covered… [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland). [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lehtimaki & Ors v Cooper, heard 14- 15 January 2020 Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLP & Ors, heard 20-23 January 2020 R V C, heard 27 January 2020 Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd (Northern Ireland), heard 28- 29 January 2020 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd, heard 11-12 February 2020 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential… [read post]