Search for: "ABC COMPANY 1-5"
Results 141 - 160
of 534
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 11:04 am
In the Courts (5 cases) NFL SETTLES IC MISCLASSIFICATION CLAIMS OF SECURITY REPRESENTATIVES. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal 6 Lawmakers in 5 Days: New COVID-19 infections put spotlight on Congress’ loose guidelines USA Today – Christal Hayes | Published: 11/18/2020 As rampant nationwide coronavirus spikes force states to reexamine reopening efforts, Congress is still struggling to maneuver around the pandemic as it encroaches on legislative business and endangers its members. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 3:19 am
I got to say, Greg Lambert 1:04 Great. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
Second, issues arising out of the case of Prudential Assurance Company Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 1:30 pm
” The ABC test referred to in this section of the Biden plan comes from the infamous A.B. 5 legislation that took effect in California on Jan. 1, 2020. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
On Thursday 12 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of Triple Point Technology Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb… [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
What the government needed from Trump’s properties, it had to buy from Trump’s company. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the respondents should still be liable to pay non-domestic rates (‘NDR’) for periods when they leased their unoccupied properties to special purpose vehicle companies (‘SPVs’) on the basis that: (1) the leases were prearranged tax avoidance schemes and the relevant statute should be interpreted accordingly; or (2) the SPVs can be disregarded by a piercing of the corporate veil. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:09 pm
” The ABC test would be modeled after California’s ABC test set forth in AB 5, which was updated by AB 2257 in September 2020. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 6:27 pm
Assembly Bill 5 (“AB 5”) adopted the three-prong ABC test from Dynamex Operations W. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 Halliburton Company v Chubb… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal considered whether proof of an offence contrary to Regulation 30(1)(g) of the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 brought against a business operator as defined in Regulation (EC) No. 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing requires proof of mens rea and/or some culpable act or omission on the part of the business operator. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
The Guardian has a report on the libel case of Chak Wing v ABC which is being heard in the Federal Court. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
The state law, California Assembly Bill 2257 (AB2257) which Governor Newsom signed into law on September 4, 2020, replaced Assembly Bill 5 (AB5), which had codified California’s version of the so-called ABC test. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 2:33 pm
Worker Classification It was only last year that the biggest labor law development was the new worker classification law, AB 5, which codified the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex ruling, using the ABC test to determine whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor, while at the same time creating numerous exceptions to the test. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
Background On AB 5 AB 5, which took effect on January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 8:23 pm
Many independent contractors complained of dire consequences after Assembly Bill 5 (AB5) became effective in California on January 1, 2020. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
How Trump’s Company Charged the U.S. [read post]
