Search for: "ACTAVIS, INC."
Results 121 - 140
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
.* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Lilly ADHD dispute (Part I)* Mr Justice Carr tackles plausibility in Actavis v Eli Lilly ADHD dispute (Part II)Annsley reports on the brand spanking new specialist Patents Court judge Mr Justice Carr’s decision in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2015] EWHC. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:59 pm
Actavis Inc., Judge Richard G. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 12:29 pm
Watson Delaware is now called Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 9:32 pm
• Defendant: Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc.; Actavis, Inc.; Allergan PLC Infringement of U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:39 am
One of the great advantages of bifurcated patent litigation [perhaps the only advantage, wonders Merpel] is that bifurcated decisions make for shorter judgments and shorter blogposts to explain them. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
Mylan and Actavis were seeking revocation of the patent. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 9:39 pm
Laboratories Inc.; Grunenthal GmbH • Defendant: Actavis Laboratories FL, Inc. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:21 pm
• Defendants: Watson Laboratories, Inc.; Actavis, Inc.; Actavis Pharma, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:47 pm
Flash forward one hundred or so years and look at the recent Pfizer case in England:From Bloomberg:Pfizer Inc. was accused by a U.K. judge of making “groundless threats” of legal action against British doctors and drugstores if they prescribed or sold a generic version of its best-selling Lyrica treatment.Judge Richard Arnold issued the rebuke as he ruled that Allergan Plc’s Actavis unit didn’t infringe Pfizer patents with its version of the drug… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:35 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
* Washington Redskins' Trade Marks tackled: disparaging, says District CourtJani writes up Pro-Football Inc v Amanda Blackhorse et al. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:59 pm
Actavis in 2013, courts (predominantly district courts) have grappled with the scope of the decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
A futuristic Neil imagines a time when consumers’ psychological/neurological associations could be measured (also) for the sake of assess a trade marks’ reputation* Case management decisions in the Lyrica caseThe ongoing case between Warner-Lambert (a subsidiary of Pfizer) and Actavis concerning pregabalin (sold by Pfizer under the trade mark Lyrica, and by Actavis under the trade mark Lecaent) seems set to be the case of the year, Darren says. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
On 24 June, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Smith & Nephew Plc v Convatec Technologies Inc & Ors [2015] EWCA Civ 607, an appeal of Birss J’s 2013 High Court judgment (reported by the IPKat amid New Year frivolities here), which can be read on BAILII.The patent in suit was EP (UK) 1 343 510 in the name of ConvaTec, a patent for a light-stabilized silverisation of gel forming fibres in the context of an antimicrobial component of a wound dressing.Mr Justice… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
So what could possibly go wrong for Actavis? [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Actavis, the Supreme Court confirmed that reverse payments can violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
General Court does not duck the issueValentina explains Case T-559/13 Giovanni Cosmetics Inc. v OHIM, Vasconcelos & Gonçalves SA, where the Court had to decide on a likelihood of confusion between two Italian-sounding marks for cosmetics.* IP litigation and enforcement: the pendulum effect -- and a new eventIP enforcement and IP conferences are like a pendulum, Jeremy says. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 48 [week ending on Sunday 31 May] - The meaning of EPO appeal system | 3D Printing and the law | Epo and external investigation firms | Umbrella designs | US Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems | European Inventor Award | FIFA and brand integrity | Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Wine in Black GmbH v OHIM | IP and busking | Swiss-style claims.Never… [read post]
