Search for: "ADAM SMITH" Results 1 - 20 of 2,851
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Tom Smith
via www.leadershipinstitute.org Here in San Diego, I guess you'd wear an Adam Smith Hawaiian shirt. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:17 am
This essay traces the citations to Adam Smith in the judicial opinions of the Federal Courts starting with the first two cases to cite Smith in 1796; 214 years ago. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
For reference, my list of “Adam Smith problems” will be divided into three broad categories: Smith the flesh-and-blood man, Smith the public intellectual, and Smith the testator. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by Christine Corcos
For reference, my list of “Adam Smith problems” will be divided into three broad categories: Smith the flesh-and-blood man, Smith the public intellectual, and Smith the testator. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:43 am by adamsmithesq
Welcome to the new—and we believe improved—Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
11 May 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Robin Paul Malloy (Syracuse University College of Law) has posted Adam Smith's Market Jurisprudence (Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 73, No. 1, 159 2023) on SSRN. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 8:00 am by David Friedman
Adam Smith was an 18thcentury radical who supported laissez-faire in large part because he thought it resulted in less poverty than the alternative, not the 21st century progressive of Noah Smith’s imagination. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:18 pm
This paper thus contributes to the Adam Smith literature in three ways: by assembling in one place the original reports of the Oxford conspiracy, by showing how this oft-told Adam Smith conspiracy story has evolved over the years, and by subjecting these accounts to lawyerly scrutiny. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:18 pm by Christine Corcos
This paper thus contributes to the Adam Smith literature in three ways: by assembling in one place the original reports of the Oxford conspiracy, by showing how this oft-told Adam Smith conspiracy story has evolved over the years, and by subjecting these accounts to lawyerly scrutiny. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 10:56 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Adam Smith in the Courts of the United States has just been posted by Robin Paul Malloy, Syracuse University College of Law. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
ABSTRACT: The paper analyzes Adam Smith’s views on monopoly focusing on Book IV and V of... [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
ABSTRACT: The paper analyzes Adam Smith’s views on monopoly focusing on Book IV and V of... [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
This essay traces the citations to Adam Smith in the judicial opinions of the Federal Courts starting with the first two cases to cite Smith in 1796; 214 years ago. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 5:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
Nicolas Hachez (Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies) has posted Views on International Law and International Relations in Adam Smith's Lectures on Jurisprudence on SSRN. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:51 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Representative Adam Smith (D-WA), ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, has written the following letter in opposition to JASTA. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 11:20 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Maria Pia Paganelli (Trinity University) has posted Crime and Punishment: Adam Smith’s Theory of Sentimental Law and Economics (Coauthored with Fabrizio Simon (Universita' di Palermo), Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 11:43 am
" But Nietzsche--surely as much mishandled as Adam Smith. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Adam Smith’s developed his constitutional theory as part of his unpublished Lectures on Jurisprudence. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:11 pm by Dan Ernst
Robin Paul Malloy, Syracuse University College of Law, has posted Adam Smith in the Courts of the United States, which appeared in the Loyola Law Review 56 (2010): 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:47 am
Adam Smith appeals to this logic again and again in his corpus to explain why, in a particular era, one type of state out-competes another. [read post]