Search for: "ALEXANDER v. HOLDER" Results 81 - 100 of 123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 9:30 am by Josh Blackman
” Ultimately, “Reno and then-Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder presented the regulations in congressional testimony. [read post]
17 May 2021, 12:45 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  Over to the IPKat's friends at Brinkhof in the Netherlands in the form of Barbara Mooij and Alexander de Leeuw:"In this second roundup of Dutch patent litigation, we dive into some of the noteworthy patent cases of the Dutch courts from July – December 2020. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
Holder of over a dozen United States and International patents, Dr. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]GlobalComing out of copyright - some notable deaths from 1937: (IPKat),Design patents: No longer the province of individual inventors: (Patently O),Fail fast, ready fire aim and Stanford v Cal: (IP Think Tank),Walls, Alexander the Great and Partha Bose: (IP Think Tank),A fair use primer for online content creators: (Ars Technica)ISO… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a member of the… [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
Take the recent case of Tungsten Partners LLC v Ace Group International LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 32025(U) [Sup Ct NY County Sept. 20, 2017], in which Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich was called upon to decide whether the plaintiff holder of a 4% non-voting profits interest, identified as a “Management Member” in a 65-page operating agreement (plus another 170 pages of schedules and exhibits), was a member of the… [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Peter Margulies
  Regents and the Role of Reasoned Decisionmaking in Termination of Programs In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
  Question: As a matter of originalist jurisprudence, do you think Alexander Bickel’s memorandum for Justice Felix Frankfurter in Brown v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]