Search for: "ALEXANDER v. HOLDER"
Results 101 - 120
of 123
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
” One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:50 pm
The first case, Biden v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
http://j.st/pb6 Palmer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 1:18 pm
In Garcetti v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Deezer or Spotify:- all featured artists combined and listened to in a month share €0.46 euros- authors (SONGWRITERS) €1.0 euro- the state/ taxation €2.0 euros (more than the authors/ performers’ share combined)- producers (labels) and streaming services combined received €6.54.With no record labels willing to provide a panellist, it was left to Alexander Ross (Partner, Wiggin LLP) and chair Keith Harris OB (a band manager and until… [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:51 pm
Two separate challenges were before the court on Tuesday, but the justices spent most of their time and energy on the first case, which is known as Biden v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
The Federalists believed that the people were for them, but that the holders of state office would oppose them. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
The word is rich with meaning, meaning that shifts subtly over the long arc of its engagement with the cultures that have used the word as the sign toward which meaning (and metaphor) could be attached.impeach (v.)formerly also empeach, late 14c., empechen, "to impede, hinder, prevent;" early 15c., "cause to be stuck, run (a ship) aground," also "prevent (from doing something)," from Anglo-French empecher, Old French empeechier "to hinder,… [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Alexander X. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
” The Federalist No. 67, at 350 (Alexander Hamilton) (George W. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Mendez in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
In the seminal prime bank case SEC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
i The Constitution’s eligibility requirements for the presidency are spare, and in every formal sense, at least, Donald J. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am
bit.ly/JQaISt (Gardere) Twitter Seeks To Quash Order Requiring Production of Account Holder’s User Information, Tweets – bit.ly/IMCMqV (K&L Gates) Was Samsung Deal a Watershed for Machine Translation in FTC Second Requests? [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
