Search for: "ANDREW J. LONG" Results 81 - 100 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2022, 2:05 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Hess, US anti-suit injunctions and German anti-anti-suit injunctions in SEP disputes Tito Rendas, Streaming platforms under Portuguese copyright law Notes Stephen J. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:45 am by Bart van Wezenbeek (Millipede)
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention 2022 Edition by Kaisa Suominen, Peter de Lange, Andrew Rudge€ 105 Practical Guide to Successful Intellectual Property Valuation and Transactions by Alexander Puutio€ 135 Internet Law: A Concise Guide to Regulation Around the… [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 5:31 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Marcus Smith J, however, wielding his “new broom” (as Andrew put it), held that the key question (as per the American Cyanamid guidelines) was not whether a patentee would suffer irreparable harm to its market position, but whether that irreparable harm could be compensated for in damages. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Helpfully in November 2020 Saini J in Qatar Airways Group v Middle East News at paragraphs 263-306 of his judgment undertook a timely, but long overdue, examination of the rule in Diamond v Sutton. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
Volume 9 Number 1 | January 2009 Editorial Internationalism and Global Norms for Neuroethicsby Stephen J. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Edited by Andrew LongstrethEdited by Andrew Longstreth LITIGATOR OF THE WEEK Patrick Fitzgerald, U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 7:10 am by emagraken
Kwon, 2009 BCSC 63, where Johnston J. said this about claims for damages for future care costs: [109]    Claims for damages for cost of future care have grown exponentially following the decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada in the trilogy of decisions usually cited under Andrews v. [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 6:44 am
On March 18, 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Salzberg v. [read post]