Search for: "ARDEN C. POST " Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2015, 12:43 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  While we live in post-notice world, notices are still wildly used, but, their significance is information, not legal. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 12:43 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  While we live in post-notice world, notices are still wildly used, but, their significance is information, not legal. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 12:43 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  While we live in post-notice world, notices are still wildly used, but, their significance is information, not legal. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
  The Advisory Committee Notes explain that the various techniques of discovery kick in by virtue of Rule 26(b), where automatic disclosure and report requirements of Rule 26(a) leave off: “Rules 26(b)(4)(B) and (C) do not impede discovery about the opinions to be offered by the expert or the development, foundation, or basis of those opinions. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
 Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Adopting a phrase of Arden LJ’s from Johnson, Lord Neuberger says, at 38, that the authority must “pay close attention to the particular circumstances of the” applicant. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Bull (George Mason University) & Adam C. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Michael Erdman
Elizabeth Arden dba ComplaintsBoard.com (No. 09-2601), an action involving the posting of allegedly defamatory statements on an internet discussion board. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Michael Erdman
Elizabeth Arden dba ComplaintsBoard.com (No. 09-2601), an action involving the posting of allegedly defamatory statements on an internet discussion board. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Michael Erdman
Elizabeth Arden dba ComplaintsBoard.com (No. 09-2601), an action involving the posting of allegedly defamatory statements on an internet discussion board. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Michael Erdman
Elizabeth Arden dba ComplaintsBoard.com (No. 09-2601), an action involving the posting of allegedly defamatory statements on an internet discussion board. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:39 am by Michael Erdman
Elizabeth Arden dba ComplaintsBoard.com (No. 09-2601), an action involving the posting of allegedly defamatory statements on an internet discussion board. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:35 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
He asked Grits to publish this extended guest post by him on the Max Soffar capital murder case, which also inspired this recent Dallas Morning News editorial. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am by S S
Damned with a faint concession Arden LJ finds that “the possibility exists that in rare cases, the discrimination defence may succeed” (paragraph 38). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post by Christopher Knight, “Personal Data in the CJEU” dealing with Cases C‑141/12 and C‑372/12 YS v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel (judgment of 17 July 2014, nyr). [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:54 am by J
  With thanks to Justin Bates of Arden Chambers, counsel for the tenant, for the note of hearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Inforrm marked its third birthday last week: its first ever post was on 22 January 2010. [read post]