Search for: "ART GRAHAM" Results 141 - 160 of 795
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2017, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
18 May 2010, 6:38 am by Marc DeGirolami
  The word "consensus" is taken to have a very special, arcane judicial meaning, a term of art that doesn't really ever reflect what's really going on in this country (39 American jurisdictions permit the sentencing practice invalidated by Graham). [read post]
5 May 2008, 10:15 am
For example, KSR and Graham, as well as a myriad of precedents of our reviewing court, teach that secondary considerations such as unexpected results may confer particularly when that disclosure indicates a preference leading away from the claimed compounds. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 9:48 am by Justin E. Gray
  In response, the district court noted that "[t]he lack of expert evidence is significant … although expert testimony is not always required, such evidence would help the court properly assess the primary factors set forth in Graham … [w]ithout the benefit of expert guidance from one skilled in the art, the court must evaluate the defendant's motion for summary judgment with only attorney argument. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:05 am by Jason Rantanen
The framework comes from throwaway language in Graham v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 6:21 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Graham, supra; In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See also In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 555 (CCPA 1975) (use of claimed feature solves no stated problem and presents no unexpected result and “would be an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art” (citing Graham v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 1985) ("In a § 103 obviousness analysis, Graham [v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:18 pm
See Graham, supra; In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Cross-border liability and jurisdiction Ilsjan (Case C-194/16) is another CJEU reference on the Article 7(2) (ex-Art 5(3)) tort jurisdiction provisions of the EU Jurisdiction Regulation. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:49 am by JD Hull
No one was more dedicated to journalism done right, done under pressure and done both for its art and for the public good. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:47 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In so doing, the Examiner must make the factual determinations set forth in Graham v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:33 am
  There is no necessary inconsistency between the TSM  test and the Graham analysis. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 12:31 pm by Sheppard Mullin
The cases are  Estate of Robert Graham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
By Suzanna Neal and the Center for Art Law Team On January 30th, 2024, the trial of Accent Delight International Ltd. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 6:22 pm
Lindsey Graham, one of his closest confidants, traveling companions and an Air Force reserve JAG attorney, thinks of the bit?) [read post]