Search for: "Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc"
Results 121 - 131
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am
The USPTO also allowed Abercrombie & Fitch to register #SoCalStylist for retail store services featuring clothing and accessories, and a non-profit to register #KickHunger for promoting public awareness of hunger and hunger relief. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:34 am
Prince (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Abercrombie & Fitch – A&F sues in Seattle for cybersquatting and unfair competition (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Google – Trademark law doesn’t allow companies to silence competitors – Public Knowledge amicus brief in Rosetta Stone v Google (Public Knowledge) [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., held that an employer had violated federal discrimination law when it declined to hire a candidate for employment because she wore a headscarf to her interview, which arguably violated the company’s “Look Policy” and which it believed, but did not actually know, she wore as a religious practice that required an accommodation. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:35 am
Booking.com B.V. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Sambo's of Georgia, Inc. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:51 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that the need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire him or her, the employer violates Title VII, regardless of whether the employer had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether he or she will actually need an accommodation. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer's actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
By Gage C. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:50 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that her need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire her, the employer has violated Title VII, regardless of whether it had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether she would actually need an accommodation. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
Companies such as Abercrombie & Fitch and New Balance Athletic Shoe have seen the effect of counterfeiting and now limit consumer purchases as a way to counteract the illegal activity of creating and selling knockoff versions of in-store items. [19] Although this activity worries some companies regarding their short-term success, the majority worry about counterfeiting’s longevity, which could ultimately bring about company and even… [read post]
