Search for: "Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 134
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2020, 6:53 am by Nedim Malovic
In a decision issued in June 2020, the US Copyright Office Review Board (CORB) reversed the earlier findings of the US Copyright Office concerning an application to register Abercrombie & Fitch’s Store Front Sculpture. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:23 am
June 4, 2019 - 2 PM: In re The Artsmiths, LLC, Serial No. 87151770 [Refusal to register the mark shown immediately below on the ground that it fails to function as a service mark for "Retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of original artwork in a wide variety of mediums; online retail store services featuring handmade artisan products in the nature of artwork in a wide variety of mediums"].June 5, 2019 - 11 AM: Abercrombie… [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm by Paul D. Knothe
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., held that an employer had violated federal discrimination law when it declined to hire a candidate for employment because she wore a headscarf to her interview, which arguably violated the company’s “Look Policy” and which it believed, but did not actually know, she wore as a religious practice that required an accommodation. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 8:13 pm by Howard Friedman
According to Law.com, Dhillon is currently general counsel for Burlington Stores, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:44 am by Dustin Carlton
  More recently, in March 2017, Abercrombie & Fitch agreed to pay $700,000 to settle a similar class action brought by sales associates. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:12 pm by Nikki Siesel
Among the co-existing marks are bird designs of Hollister (owned by Abercrombie and Fitch) and Eddie Bauer. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., holding that an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant if the employer was motivated by avoiding the need to accommodate a religious practice. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., holding that an employer may not refuse to hire an applicant if the employer was motivated by avoiding the need to accommodate a religious practice. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am by Aaron Rubin and Dina Roumiantseva
The USPTO also allowed Abercrombie & Fitch to register #SoCalStylist for retail store services featuring clothing and accessories, and a non-profit to register #KickHunger for promoting public awareness of hunger and hunger relief. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 10:51 am by Holland & Hart
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that the need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire him or her, the employer violates Title VII, regardless of whether the employer had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether he or she will actually need an accommodation. [read post]
15 May 2016, 5:50 am by Colorado Employment Law Letter
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., if an applicant can show that her need for a religious accommodation is a “motivating factor” in the employer’s decision not to hire her, the employer has violated Title VII, regardless of whether it had actual knowledge of the applicant’s religious beliefs or whether she would actually need an accommodation. [read post]