Search for: "Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc" Results 21 - 40 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2013, 6:42 pm by Howard Friedman
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc., (ND CA, April 9, 2013), involves the question of whether Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act when it failed to hire a Muslim teenager, Halla Banafa, as a part-time stock-room employee. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:29 am by Joy Waltemath
A district court’s grant of summary judgment to the EEOC finding that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII by failing to provide a reasonable religious accommodation to a Muslim woman’s wearing of a headscarf or “hijab” was reversed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit (EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc, October 1, 2013, Holmes, J). [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:19 pm by The Federalist Society
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc, decided on June 1, involves Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits a prospective employer from (among other things) refusing to hire an applicant in order to avoid accommodating a religious practice that it could accommodate without undue hardship. [read post]
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. rejected the Tenth Circuit’s holding that, to prove discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), it is an applicant’s burden to advise an employer of a religious practice necessitating accommodation. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:12 am by Gregory Schmitz
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14–86, 575 U.S. ____ (Jun. 1, 2015). [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., which made our list as one of our five issues to watch for 2015. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 10 C 4866, 2011 WL 5903495 (N.D. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am by Siegel, LeWitter & Malkani
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Lee Tankle
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., the Supreme Court addressed religious accommodations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:05 pm by Maureen Johnston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86 Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights At of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer’s actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]