Search for: "Abercrombie and Fitch Stores Inc"
Results 81 - 100
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2014, 6:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. could impact other situations in which employees may need accommodations from employers, such as for a disability, or for gender-identity related issues. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:56 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:06 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:33 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., No. 14-86. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm
Following that conference, the Justices granted the petition for cert in EEOC v Abercrombie and Fitch Stores, Inc. and dismissed as improvidently granted Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 11:56 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., a case involving an employee who wore a headscarf (or "hijab") to work for religious reasons, but was told to remove because it conflicted with Abercrombie's clothing policy. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:40 am
Abercrombie & Fitch. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:02 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch, the Ninth Circuit found that the unauthorized use of several photographs of surf legends in an Abercrombie clothing catalog was commercial, notwithstanding that the images were employed to illustrate the catalogue’s underlying surf theme.[17] The Ninth Circuit stated that the photographs were mere “window dressing” to the catalog’s surf motif and ultimately were exploited to promote Abercrombie’s clothing… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer's actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:05 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86 Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights At of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer’s actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Abercrombie & Fitch, et al, US 10th Cir. (8/29/14)Business Law, Civil Rights, Class Action, ContractsDefendants–Appellants Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., and J.M. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 11:36 am
Dillard Store Services, Inc. (10th Cir., August 27, 2014) (reversing dismissal of plaintiff's claims) [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 731 F.3d 1106 (10th Cir. 2013). [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
A district court’s grant of summary judgment to the EEOC finding that Abercrombie & Fitch violated Title VII by failing to provide a reasonable religious accommodation to a Muslim woman’s wearing of a headscarf or “hijab” was reversed on appeal by the Tenth Circuit (EEOC v Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc, October 1, 2013, Holmes, J). [read post]
