Search for: "Accessories Marketing, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 271
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am by CMS
Following the decision of the House of Lords, in Macmillan Inc v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant Mason Rothschild is a "marketing strategist" and "Entrepreneur" who "come[s] from the fashion industry. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
 It said this benefited Apple Pay, Apple’s own mobile wallet solution on iPhones and iPads, and pointed to the company’s significant market power in the market for smart mobile devices and dominance in mobile wallet markets. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
October 26, 2023 - 1 PM: Caterpillar, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 6:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., 942 F.3d 1119 (Fed. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:37 pm by Kevin V. Small
On September 28, 2018, pH Beauty purchased a company known as Paris Presents, a marketer of cosmetic and bath accessories. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
This alleged scheme involves the use of identical trademarks and misleading marketing to present Ripps’ collection as on par with the authentic Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs.[4] Furthermore, Yuga accuses Ripps of promoting the upcoming marketplace “Ape Market” to foster confusion about the association between his NFTs and the legitimate Bored Ape Yacht Club.[5] On December 27, 2022, Ripps filed their Answer and Counterclaim, alleging six claims against Yuga: (1)… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:11 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Nicholas Drews
Companies marketing their products as “Made in USA” should consult the FTC’s Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:33 am by Jason Rantanen
 Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., 21-2299 (submitted but not decided) (oral argument recording available here) The Federal Circuit heard oral arguments today in the second round of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:46 am by Eric Goldman
Some instances of actual confusion are probative of initial interest confusion. * Enchante Accessories, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by Josh H. Escovedo
” Roma Clothing claims to have been using the marks for decades and spent significant sums of money marketing and promoting its clothing line in commerce. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Defendant Mason Rothschild is a "marketing strategist" and "Entrepreneur" who "come[s] from the fashion industry. [read post]