Search for: "Actavis Group PTC ehf"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2019, 8:24 am
Jane Lambert Supreme Court (Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) Actavis Group PTC EHF and others v ICOS Corporation and another [2019] UKSC 15 (27 March 2019) In The Cialis Litigation - Actavis Group PTC EHF and Others v Icos Corp and Another 4 Oct 2016, I discussed Mr Justice Birss's judgment in Actavis and others v Eli Lilly and Co [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016) [read post]
22 May 2021, 8:59 am
2D Structure of TravoprostAuthor Vaccinationist Source Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Alcon Research LLC and other v Actavis Group PTC EHF and others [2021] EWHC 1026 (Pat) (23 April 2021)This was an action for the infringement of European patent (UK) 1 920 764 which had expired in 2014 and a counterclaim for its revocation on grounds of anticipation, obviousness [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:02 am
In Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF and Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 Jan 2015) Warner-Lambert LLC applied to Mr Justice Arnold for an interim injunction in the following terms: "1, The Defendants: (a) shall make it a condition of any oral or written agreement entered into with a pharmacy for the supply of Lecaent that the pharmacy shall use reasonable [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
The Supreme Court was asked to decide in November 2018, when it heard the appeal by Actavis Group PTC EHF and Ors (the Respondents) against ICOS Corporation and Anor (the Appellants). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
In a judgment handed down today Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556 the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Justice Floyd) has put forward a wider test for the infringement of second medical use patents. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
A wife complaints to the Qadi about her husband's impotence Artist: Hamse-i Atai (18th century Ottoman miniature) Source Wikipedia Mr Justice Birss: Actavis and Others v Eli Lilly and Another [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat) (10 Aug 2016) Although it is not spelt out anywhere in the 492 paragraphs and annexes to Mr Justice Birss's judgment, this complicated [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 3:24 am
On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 1671 This appeal considered what the correct test is for obviousness in the context of assessing the validity of a pharmaceutical patent. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm
In a decision that is only moderately Arnoldian (139 paragraphs), Mr Justice Arnold refused today to grant an interim injunction that Warner Lambert had requested against Actavis [Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) (21 January 2015)]. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:31 am
This Kat posted last month on the fascinating case of Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat), in which Arnold J gave the first detailed UK consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
This blogpost reported the Patents Court ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat). [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:55 am
The full citation is Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015).Rather than reproduce earlier posts, the IPKat would refer readers who are new to this saga to his earlier posts, hereand here.That this Order was made was intriguing to this moggy. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
Today's the day that many pharmaceutical patent term extension-watchers have been waiting for with feelings of optimism or anxiety: the day on which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑577/13, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
To complicate matters further, the first claimant was the Actavis parent company, whereas Actavis’s lawyers had initially written to Lilly’s solicitors stating that they represented a subsidiary, Actavis Group PTC ehf, and its “relevant national subsidiaries”. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
In the meantime, here they are in outline:Case C‑443/12, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Sanofi, Sanofi Pharma Bristol-Myers Squibb SNC intervening, noted on The SPC Blog here. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:19 am
In a long awaited decision by the UK Supreme Court, the matter was (finally) put to bed, at least in the UK.The case of Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation concerned a dosage patent owned by ICOS (EP1173181), which related to the use of tadalafil (more commonly known as Cialis) in a dosage form for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:21 am
Subsequently, two companies, Generics (UK) Ltd (trading as Mylan) and Actavis Group PTC EHF, obtained authorization by the EU to market the compound for application to both epilepsy and general anxiety disorders. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and here]. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Last week the Court of Appeal said that was incorrect in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and that actually all that is required is for the infringer to know, or be able to reasonably foresee, that the medicament would be used to treat the condition (Katpost here). [read post]
