Search for: "Adams v. Clinton" Results 61 - 80 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
Yet that is precisely what the court did by a 9-to-0 vote in the 1997 case of Clinton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
In 2016, candidate Hilary Clinton inspired many feminists because of her XX 23rd chromosomes. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
In 2016, candidate Hilary Clinton inspired many feminists because of her XX 23rd chromosomes. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
Second Amendment scholar Adam Winkler cautions gun-control groups, for example, that even a Supreme Court with a liberal majority is not likely to overturn District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
Although Donald Trump has insisted that “no one respects women more” than he does, his statements, actions, and record speak volumes to the contrary.Trump v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 1:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  (If you won't believe me, then read Richard Posner's great opinion in Walker v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am by Adam Chandler
” At the Daily Beast, Mark McKinnon and Myra Adams explain why the prospect of Hillary Clinton being nominated to the Court is “not as far-fetched as you might think. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys a range of potential Supreme Court nominees in a hypothetical Hillary Clinton presidency, using several criteria to narrow the field and producing a list of five top candidates, headed by Judge Sri Srinivasan, in addition to current nominee Chief Judge Merrick Garland. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 7:30 am by Erin Miller
 At Forbes, law professor Richard Epstein defends originalism against Souter’s tacit critique, arguing that Souter’s alternative method of constitutional interpretation indefensibly portrays Plessy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:41 am by James Bickford
Many newspapers carried editorials about Snyder v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:37 am
The law was simply a policy preference.Justice Thomas, quoting Stewart, made the exact same argument in his dissent in Lawrence v. [read post]