Search for: "Addington v. Addington"
Results 41 - 60
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 12:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:45 am
Similarly, in Nixon v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
In response to this "legal uprising," David Addington and Alberto Gonzales decided to task John Yoo to prepare memoranda. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
"But where are the unitary executive proponents -- in the Administration and among the academic and other champions of Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
In this case, the trial judge had to bear in mind that he had already increased the damages for wrongful dismissal in accordance with Wallace v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
(See Jack Goldsmith's memoir The Terror Presidency, pp. 22-23; according to Goldsmith, other War Council members included Alberto Gonzales, David Addington, William J. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 10:12 am
Attorney Greg Addington):... [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 9:03 am
" Marbury v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 8:48 am
After the 1983 INS v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:29 am
Goldsmith argues that the Cheney-Addington effort to expand presidential power has backfired, and the ironic result is that future presidents will be weaker. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 11:34 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Timothy Kevin Addington v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
The Secret Advantages of Judge Taylor's Opinion in ACLU v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 9:05 am
When can you go after David Addington's assets because you're angry about what he's been up to in prosecuting the war on terror? [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:50 pm
Mark Graber has argued that this is how the constitutional dispute over Texas' admission to the union was finally settled, as well as the legitimacy of the Bush Presidency following Bush v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 9:57 am
The US had submitted a brief, I believe, for restructuring Mississippi higher eduction according to the principle of Green v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
If you were NSA General Counsel, how would you react if the President asked you to engage in conduct that is on its face criminal; if you learned that Jack Goldsmith and John Ashcroft of all officials, concluded that there was no legal way around the statutory restriction and refused to be associated with it; and if the only justification the President offered you for obeying his order was that he was adopting David Addington's, uh, shall we say idiosyncratic, view of the… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
