Search for: "Advantage Health Group, Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 539
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2021, 9:19 am
FTC Health Breach Rule For PHR Breaches The FTC Health Breach Rule applies to breaches of electronic PHR. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 4:50 pm
LinkedIn SLP Health Care Risk Management & Operations Group, HR & Benefits Update Compliance Group, and/or Coalition for Responsible Health Care Policy. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 7:35 am
On Jan. 2, 2018, it was announced that CFIUS had rejected Ant Financial’s takeover of U.S. money transfer company MoneyGram International Inc. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Finishing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
The first category is where, as stated in Akai Pty Ltd v The People’s Insurance Co Ltd, enforcement ‘offends the public policy of the forum whether evinced by statute or declared by judicial decision’.[12] This includes the situation ‘where the party commencing proceedings in the face of an exclusive jurisdiction clause seeks to take advantage of what is or may be a mandatory law of the forum’.[13] The prohibition in Australian law against misleading and… [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 11:41 am
Colonial Automotive Group, Inc., brazenly ignored that order and continued to sell cars out of its “closed” showrooms. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:21 pm
This case illustrates the AG’s commitment to holding accountable fraudsters taking advantage of the COVID-19 health crisis to cheat taxpayers. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 1:19 pm
Ericsson Inc v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 7:32 am
Casey‘s “undue burden” standard or Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:59 am
Restrictive Covenant Linked to Employee Incentive Program The restrictive covenants at issue in the case, United Health Care Services, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 6:06 pm
A California Court of Appeal held in See’s Candy Shops, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
The goal of these specific donations, according to DJI, was to help with the monitoring of public health issues in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic—on its face, at least, a laudable goal. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:22 am
From 2012 through 2016, health care benefit programs, including TRICARE, reimbursed Advantage Pharmacy at least $200 million. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
Norwood Realty, Inc., the letter of intent contained language that was explicitly binding.[46] The court held the letter of intent fell into the first category: Here, the intent of the parties to be bound by the letter of intent is not left to inference from the terms of their agreement but is twice expressly stated in prominent parts of the letter of intent. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Trib., Oct. 2, 2020; Laura Zuckerman, Animal Group Claims It Set Fire to Idaho Fur Store, Reuters, Sept. 26, 2011. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
The event planning comes as the nation is battered by another surge in coronavirus cases, prompting a fresh round of warnings from public health experts to avoid group settings, particularly indoors. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12] Australian Health… [read post]
