Search for: "Al Tucker" Results 21 - 40 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2009, 5:00 pm
According to reports, Charles Tucker, 39, and his wife, Tina Tucker, 35, were taken into custody, along with 34-year-old Wade Johnson, at the Tucker's Millwood Road residence in Greensboro. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 5:05 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker The concurrence and dissent in Briggs et al v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 11:50 am by Robert Chesney
Tucker, with assistance from Trial Attorney Bridget Behling of the Justice Department’s Counterterrorism Section. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:41 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Rusty Tucker The Supreme Court of Texas has ruled that oil and gas leases under consideration in BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 12:45 pm by Latham & Watkins LLP
The post UAE Publishes First Federal Data Protection Law appeared first on Al-Mirsal. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:51 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Tucker has litigated many cases concerning the rights of patients with terminal illness, including Glucksberg v WA, Quill v NY, Baxter v Montana, Bergman v Eden Medical Center, Hargett v Vitas, AIMS et al v DEA.Plaintiffs are also represented by leading disability rights litigator Cat Cabalo and civil rights litigator Adam Wolf of Peiffer Wolf. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Trust Mismanagement; Indian Tucker Act; Navajo-Hopi Land Settlement Act of 1974) NDN Collective, et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Russell-Tucker, (D CT, Dec. 1, 2023), a Connecticut federal district court dismissed 1st and 14th Amendment challenges to Connecticut's removal of its religious exemption from school vaccination requirements. [read post]
15 Oct 2022, 7:08 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Glucksberg et al. (1997) declined to find that a physician’s assistance with active lethal means to cause death was constitutionally protected. [read post]