Search for: "Allen v. District of Columbia"
Results 21 - 40
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 7:04 am
Allen Stanford’s $7 billion Ponzi scheme (SEC v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:40 pm
Boasberg of the District of Columbia, has enjoined the rule because of a lack of a quorum. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
District of Columbia, 35 F. 4th 870, 872 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:56 am
In Monasky v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 8:29 pm
Fourteen years earlier, the court’s modern jurisprudence on guns began with the decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
Allen v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am
” Briefly: At The World and Everything In It (podcast), Mary Reichard discusses the oral arguments in Allen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
V. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
The Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, overturned the conviction. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm
On August 18, 2023, the US District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
(Colon v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:53 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to challenge the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) rejection of a local (Kinston, N.C.) [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Allen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:30 pm
That’s the number of potential plaintiffs in a class action suit filed today in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:36 am
Rice’s ruling preserved, for the time being, access to the drug in at least the 17 states involved, as well as the District of Columbia. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
Jun 17, 2009)(Wainwright) COLUMBIA MEDICAL CENTER OF LAS COLINAS, INC. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
Although plaintiff conceded that the law of the fifty states plus the District of Columbia would apply to the members of the nationwide class, he argued that the differences between the states’ laws on implied warranty claims were negligible because the implied warranty is a Uniform Commercial Code claim. [read post]
