Search for: "Alliance for the Wild Rockies "
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 10:18 am
Here: Federal Opening Brief Humane Society Opening Brief Idaho Opening Brief Montana Opening Brief Safari Club Opening Brief Sportsmen’s Alliance Opening Brief Wyoming Farm Bureau Opening Brief Wyoming Opening Brief Crow Answer Brief Northern Cheyenne Tribe Answer Brief Wildearth Guardians Answer Brief Alliance for the Wild Rockies Answer Brief Federal Reply Idaho Reply Montana Reply Brief Safari Club Reply Sportsmen’s Alliance Reply Wyoming… [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:14 pm
USFWS’s proposal is reportedly concerning to conservation groups, including Trout Unlimited and Alliance for the Wild Rockies, which urge incorporation of measurable population objectives, such as overall population size and number of adults and juveniles and occupied miles of stream, in the revised recovery plan. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 12:52 pm
Montana - Judge Lovell of the District Court for the District of Montana denied the plaintiff's request to withdraw its motion for a preliminary injunction as to the State of Montana's aerial hazing of buffalo. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:36 pm
On July 28, 2010 the 9th Circuit reversed a district court order denying a preliminary injunction in favor of the Montana-based environmental group. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 6:13 pm
Montana - Alliance for the Wild Rockies has filed suit alleging the Forest Service's failure to consider impacts from small logging projects on the Grizzly Bear's habitat in the Kootenai National Forest. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
Alliance for the Wild Rockies told the court that the helicopters would permanently driver their bears from their habitat. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm
Alliance for Wild Rockies v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:21 am
Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 12:06 pm
District Court for the District of Oregon filed by the Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Friends of the Wild Swan, alleging that the Service failed to designate adequate critical habitat and unlawfully excluded areas from the final designation. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:07 pm
Two environmental groups, Wildwest Institute and the Alliance for the Wild Rockies (Plaintiffs), filed a lawsuit challenging the Service’s determination, asserting that the Service violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) by (1) not strictly following the Service’s listing priority guidelines; (2) considering factors outside of the guidelines; and (3) finding that listing the whitebark pine was precluded by species with a lower degree of threat without… [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:17 pm
Alliance for the Wild Rockies, a co-plaintiff in the case, issued a press release June 7. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:25 pm
Sharon Hapner, Alliance for Wild Rockies, and Native Ecosystems Council (collectively Plaintiffs) challenged the Project, contending that it violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:52 pm
In Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm
On July 1, 2009, the court granted our request for a voluntary remand of the 2005 final rule and directed the Service to submit a new proposed rule to the Federal Register by December 31, 2009, and to submit a final decision on that proposed rule to the Federal Register by September 30, 2010 (Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 1:47 pm
.' Alliance for the Wild Rockies, 632 F.3d at 1138. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:14 am
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 7:38 am
” In 2013, Plaintiff Alliance for the Wild Rockies brought suit, claiming that the Project would create a net permanent increase in road miles in violation of the Forest Plan access amendments and would therefore violate: (1) the National Forest Management Act (NFMA); (2) the ESA, by failing to comply with the ITS limitations; and (3) NEPA, by incorrectly stating in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Project that the Project will comply with the Forest… [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm
I find hope that these alliances are possible in the negotiations between the Fish & Wildlife Service and Montana and Idaho. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:26 am
Under Alliance for the Wild Rockies, we therefore ask whether Ward has raised "serious questions going to the merits. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:34 pm
A purely emotional response (save the wild kitties!) [read post]
