Search for: "Allstate Corp" Results 81 - 100 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2017, 3:43 am by Broc Romanek
Or once in a blue moon… Corp Fin: NFL Fan Clubs as “Securities” I find this blog by Bryan Pilko interesting because I processed a similar no-action letter when I was in Corp Fin’s Office of Chief Counsel twenty years ago. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 3:52 am by Broc Romanek
Since then, Corp Fin has issued these 18 FAQs to flesh out its new position, which commences July 10th… We’re posting related memos in our “IPOs” Practice Area. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 7:18 am by Mark S. Humphreys
” The Allstate Corp. agreed to acquire SquareTrade, a consumer electronics and appliance protection plan provider that distributes through many of America’s major retailers. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:30 pm
., 2013], for example, the court held:Generally, absent bad faith, an insurer is not obligated to pay out claims ratably and/or consolidate them (Allstate Ins. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Last week I sent out a survey and asked the question, How The Heck Did YOU End Up in Workers’ Comp? [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
"The litigation is just off the scale," said Mark Hanna, a spokesman for the Insurance Council of Texas, an Austin trade group that represents firms including Allstate Corp. and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Terrible Herbst, 653 F.3d 1081 (2011) (discussed here), in which the Ninth Circuit held that an unaccepted offer in full satisfaction of a plaintiff's claims does not moot a putative class action, remains good law after Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
Terrible Herbst, 653 F.3d 1081 (2011) (discussed here), in which the Ninth Circuit held that an unaccepted offer in full satisfaction of a plaintiff's claims does not moot a putative class action, remains good law after Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am by Law Lady
Adoption -- Circuit court erred in entering order requiring adoption agency to conduct a diligent search for putative father of child placed with agency for adoption -- Adoption agency is not required to serve a notice of intended adoption plan on a putative father unless the mother has first identified a known and locatable unmarried biological father by the date the mother signs her consent for adoption -- Agency is not required to conduct a diligent search for the putative father unless the… [read post]