Search for: "Alt v. United States of America" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  True, the Second Circuit has indicated that “use in commerce” is broader than “commercial speech,” United We Stand America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:04 pm by Sandy Levinson
 The sociopath who claims to represent the Republican Party (and who, of course, received a record number of popular votes on his way to the nomination) is playing to far more than simply the "alt right" view of the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This is one of those cases that seems to be an extreme outlier, but then again see United We Stand America v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Most judges understand this distinction intuitively because they learned as 1Ls that the Constitution only restricts state action, not private action. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Can you do what the Framers imagined and hoped (against hope) United States’ leaders would do: serve the people and the higher good? [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 7:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The three-step screening we’ve developed across the United States, which includes county, federal and multi-state checks, has set a new standard.... [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 7:38 am
Could "The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down," composed by a Canadian, really have integrated so much anguish, nostalgia and disappointment on one track without the input of Helm, the one Band member who actually hailed from the United States? [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Wilson, Inc. is the owner of the Trademark, GRISHKO and its goodwill in the United States of America. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Indeed, it is “the sole supplier of thermally buttfused PVC pipe in the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]