Search for: "Alternate Energy Holdings, Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 12:30 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Id.; see Coinmach Corp., 417 S.W.3d at 926; XTO Energy, Inc., 357 S.W.3d at 62-63 (concluding that although validity of deed was contested, essence of suit was title dispute and therefore award of attorney's fees pursuant to declaratory judgments act was improper); see also RIHR Inc., 308 S.W.3d at 454. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
She filed suit in 2011 to seek contribution from the parties she considered responsible for the contamination: Woodruff Energy, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
She filed suit in 2011 to seek contribution from the parties she considered responsible for the contamination: Woodruff Energy, Inc. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
She filed suit in 2011 to seek contribution from the parties she considered responsible for the contamination: Woodruff Energy, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
McKibben is currently the Founder and President of MAC Energy Advisors LLC., a consulting company that assists clients on alternative energy, renewable energy, water and clean technology investments. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
McKibben is currently the Founder and President of MAC Energy Advisors LLC., a consulting company that assists clients on alternative energy, renewable energy, water and clean technology investments. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am by William W. Abbott
” The appellate court affirmed the ruling of the trial court holding that transmission of electrical energy does not qualify the Project for an exemption based upon § 53091(e) and the administrative record did not support the District’s finding of no feasible alternatives for the Project location under § 53096(a). [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 9:05 am by William W. Abbott
” The appellate court affirmed the ruling of the trial court holding that transmission of electrical energy does not qualify the Project for an exemption based upon § 53091(e) and the administrative record did not support the District’s finding of no feasible alternatives for the Project location under § 53096(a). [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:42 am by WIMS
Request for Scientific Views - Extension of Request for Scientific Views for Updated National Recommended Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health PDF | Text | (click for the complete Energy & EPA announcements) (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
In terms of other interesting developments during the second quarter, two courts of appeal ground through three of highly detailed cases: California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 5:03 am
  Today's post describes another successful cross-selling effort that I wrote about for Law Firm Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 9:03 am by WIMS
Matt Cartwright (D-PA-17), Diana DeGette (D-CO-01), Jared Polis (D-CO-02), and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL-09) said by closing loopholes, the "Frack Pack" bills (H.Rs.1460, 1482 & 1515 would hold the energy industry to the same standards that apply to everyone. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:18 pm
Idacorp, Inc., 379 F 3rd. 641, 647 (9th Cir. 2004) ("Grays Harbor"), the Court of Appeal upheld the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend, holding that the claims were preempted by the Federal Power Act ("FPA"), and the exclusive regulatory authority of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) is estimated to hold. [read post]