Search for: "Amazon.com LLC" Results 61 - 80 of 539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Cameron analyzed matters similarly with regard to Kentucky's price-gouging law, which limits charging supposedly "grossly" "excess[ive]" prices during an emergency.[5] An association of online merchants claimed that the law, as applied to sales on Amazon.com, violated the Dormant Commerce Clause's extraterritoriality prong: Amazon requires online third-party sellers to set a single national price for goods and doesn't permit them to withhold sales in… [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:37 am by Jack Goldsmith
‌3d 540 (6th Cir. 2021) (upholding Kentucky's price-gouging law as applied to sales on Amazon.com); SPGGC, LLC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:08 am by Scott Hervey
Amazon.com Inc., now rejected by a number of courts. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 6:24 am by Don Asher
  The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) investigated the tragedy, issuing a “Hazard Alert Letter” to Amazon.com Services LLC on April 26, 2022. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
No time to rebrand as 21 week delay to injunction refusedCombe International LLC v Dr August Wolff GmbH [2022] EWHC 125 (Ch) (January 2022)We covered the hoo-ha between VAGISIL and VAGISAN in the last volume. [read post]
Among other things, the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) authorizes U.S. courts to enforce arbitration agreements in “contract[s] evidencing a transaction involving commerce,” but excludes from its scope “contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:24 am by Jason Shinn
Amazon.com Services, LLC, Case No. 3:22-cv-00942, the Complaint asserts plaintiff reported to Amazon’s Investigations unit that an employee was using the illegal drug, psilocybin mushrooms. [read post]
6 May 2022, 12:10 pm by Ana Popovich
PillPack, LLC, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amazon.com, Inc., will pay $5.79 million to settle a lawsuit that it improperly billed “Government healthcare programs (“GHPs”), including Medicare and Medicaid, for more insulin pens than patients needed according to their prescriptions. [read post]