Search for: "Amerada Hess"
Results 1 - 20
of 58
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
“Generally, a valid release constitutes a complete bar to an action on a claim that is the subject of the release” (Nucci v Nucci, 118 AD3d 762, 763; see Burnside 711, LLC v Amerada Hess Corp., 175 AD3d 557, 559). [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 19, 2023, the Supreme Court removed two key potential obstacles to the criminal prosecution of foreign states and their agencies and instrumentalities in U.S. courts. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
First, Halkbank had pointed to one sentence from Amerada Hess stating that the FSIA was the “sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction over a foreign state in federal court,” which the majority dis-analogized to criminal cases. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428, 434 (1989). [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 379 F.3d 32, 50 (2d Cir. 2004) (holding expert witness’s specific causation opinion that plaintiff’s squamous cell carcinoma had been caused by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was unreliable, when plaintiff had smoked and drunk alcohol) Deutsch v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 12:50 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 379 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 2004); Poulis-Minott v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 2010-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 2010-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., the fact that an injury occurred in the U.S. is insufficient to waive sovereign immunity. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 12:05 pm
In its 2018 complaint against Hess (which developed the property in 1958 when it was known as Amerada Hess Corporation) and Buckeye Partners, LP (which acquired the property from Hess in 2013), the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) alleged discharges of oil affecting the nearby Smith Creek and Arthur Kill during Hess’s period of ownership. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
(Argentine Republic v Amerada Hess Shipping Corp, 488 US 428) Plaintiffs relied on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
(Argentine Republic v Amerada Hess Shipping Corp, 488 US 428) Plaintiffs relied on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) of 1976, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:49 am
The court notes that Borison’s curriculum vitae shows that he has forty years of experience in the maritime industry, which includes six years as a safety representative of Amerada Hess Corporation and sixteen years as a safety supervisor at McDermott, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:00 am
Amerada Hess. [read post]
