Search for: "Amerada Hess Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm by Steven Boutwell
Amerada Hess Corp.[6] There, the court “clarified that damage to property creates a personal right to sue, which unlike a real right, does not transfer to a subsequent purchaser ‘[i]n the absence of an assignment or subrogation. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:36 am by Liskow & Lewis
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that involved a predial (not a mineral) lease, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent buyer of the land. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:36 am by Liskow & Lewis
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that involved a predial (not a mineral) lease, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent buyer of the land. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 788 F. 2d 741, 744–745 (11th Cir. 1986). [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
., OWCP, 455 U.S. 608, 615 (1982), and the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Amerada Hess Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
The Fifth Circuit recently clarified and reaffirmed its holding in Amerada Hess Corp. v. [read post]