Search for: "American Chemistry Council v. EPA"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am
<> American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:06 pm
American Chemistry Council et al. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm
EPA; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm
EPA; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:00 am
EPA; and American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 1:04 pm
" Cal Dooley, President and CEO of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) also issued a statement saying, "EPA is reconsidering major portions of these rules, and businesses should not be asked to comply until final requirements are clear. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
” The American Chemistry Council also issued a statement in support of the Court’s granting of certiorari, which said in part: “We hope the Court will correct EPA’s egregious misreading of the Clean Air Act, which even the agency concedes leads to ‘absurd results. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
The American Chemistry Council (ACC) issued a release and expressed disappointment about the court's decision to grant EPA only one additional month to issue industrial boiler emission standards. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
<> American Chemistry Council Publishes 2014 Comprehensive Economic Profile of $812 Billion Business of American Chemistry - The American Chemistry Council (ACC) today issued its 2014 edition of the Guide to the Business of Chemistry. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:26 pm
Numerous industry groups, including the American Chemistry Council and the South Coast Air Quality Management District have intervened in support of EPA. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:43 am
The agenda states that to satisfy one of the commitments in a settlement agreement reached with the American Chemistry Council (Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0110-0139), EPA is proposing a correction pertaining to the 200 parts per billion (ppb) level described in 40 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
Speakers included Tom Myers from the Chamber, Jim Gulliford from EPA, Bill Gulledge from the American Chemistry Council, Sean Murdock from the NanoBusiness Alliance, and Shaun Clancy from Evonik Degussa. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
LoGiudice v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Energy System - The American Chemistry Council (ACC) issued the following statement in response to the EPA'S proposed rules New EPA Rule Will Threaten Manufacturers' Competitive Advantage - National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) President and CEO Jay Timmons issued this statement American wind energy can help states, consumers meet new carbon pollution standard and save money -… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 1:38 pm
The American Chemistry Council (ACC) indicated that it has estimated that the so-called, "Boiler MACT" rules "would jeopardize some 60,000 jobs and impose capital costs on the order of $3.8 billion in the chemical industry alone. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
EPA <> Industry Reaction To Supreme Court Decision: ACC Welcomes Supreme Court Ruling in Greenhouse Gas Case (American Chemistry Council) API welcomes high court decision EPA carbon rules (American Petroleum Institute) NAM Applauds SCOTUS Ruling on EPA's GHG Regulations (National Association of Manufacturers) <> Enviros Reaction To Supreme Court Decision: U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:53 pm
EPA, 12-1146; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:22 pm
" The American Chemistry Council (ACC) President and CEO Cal Dooley issued a statement on the rule saying, "We are extraordinarily concerned about EPA's plans for regulating stationary sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA), as outlined in the 'tailoring rule' released today. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
<> ACC Announces New Principles to Enhance Chemical Hazard and Risk Assessments - American Chemistry Council (ACC) introduced a set of comprehensive principles for improving chemical hazard and risk assessment programs ("Principles"). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
” On the other hand, industry groups like the American Chemistry Council were also pleased, welcoming the majority opinion as a check on EPA’s regulatory authority. [read post]
