Search for: "American Honda Motor Co. Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which held that an “action was barred because it directly conflicted with the agency’s policy choice to encourage flexibility to foster innovation. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm
  This means that each co-defendant in a tort case is liable for no more than his respective percentage of fault. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 935 A.2d 787, 795 (N.J. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
American Honda Motor Co., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s finding that three Calcar patents are unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
Virginia viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and upholding the maximum amount a rational jury could award on the record so viewed (measured by the relevant legal guideposts), based on Honda Motor Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000), which PLAC not only briefed, but helped organize (defense counsel was simultaneously on PLAC’s case selection committee). [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:27 pm by Sean Wajert
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581, 588 (9th Cir. 2012). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012), contained a throwaway line “[N]o class may be certified that contains members lacking Article III standing,” citing a Second Circuit case but then immediately citing Stearns and not explaining the contradiction, and then setting a low bar for standing: as the court here summarized, “[s]imply spending money on something that doesn’t do what it claims to do is all the… [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 900 F.Supp. 1287, 1296 (C.D. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 3:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 666 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2012), which, the court held, didn’t establish a bright-line rule rejecting all nationwide classes under California consumer protection statutes. [read post]