Search for: "Analog Devices, Inc"
Results 121 - 140
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Medtronic, Inc., 704 F.3d 1224 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 3:13 am
” See Estee Lauder Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Bieffe USA, Inc., 35 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
But that’s not a drug or device case. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
But that’s not a drug or device case. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
But that’s not a drug or device case. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Unfortunately, we had other things going on - and Best wasn't a drug/device case - so we didn't get around to examining that decision until now. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 10:27 am
A skittish Markem-Imaje sought declaratory judgment from 7,150,572, which claims a transfer printing device. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:06 pm
" A more perspicuous term is "sexual devices," by analogy to "medical devices. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:07 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992); Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
My two cents: A mere footnote in the decision also noted that the spec contained broad language suggesting that "circuitry" covered software implementations: “[W]hile the disclosed embodiments of the present invention utilize programmed processors, and special-purpose integrated circuits, and digital processors these devices can be implemented using discrete devices, or any analog or hybrid counterpart of any of these devices. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 10:36 am
Riegel SG/FDA Merits br. at 6, 11 ("FDA's premarket approval gives specific content to those general requirements as applied to a particular device"), 24 (requirements "include the specific design and labeling requirements imposed as part of the PMA process").PMA is in no way comparable to the less rigorous form of marketing clearance at issue in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:31 am
Arista Networks,Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:14 am
In re Fantasia Distribution, Inc., Serial No. 86185623 (September 21, 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Morton David Goldberg, Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, New York, New York, for amici Alliance Entertainment Corp., Audible Inc., Blue Spike, Inc., The Clandestine Group, Inc., Digimarc Corporation, Digital Media on Demand, Inc., FullAudio Corporation, InterTrust Technologies Corporation, Oak Technology, Inc., Reciprocal, Inc., RioPort, Inc., RPK SecureMedia Inc., Verance Corporation, and VNU USA, Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
Instruments Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Pfizer Inc., 58 A.D.3d 138, 141 (N.Y. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 2:37 pm
In doing so, the court analogized these facts to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Eyeblaster, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:58 pm
In medical device cases that third-party professional would be the doctor who prescribes/uses the device. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
Sequus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 353214 (9th Cir. [read post]
