Search for: "Annex Properties, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2016, 5:24 pm
Plaintiff BT Holdings, LLC, a Delaware corporation that owns approximately 68.4 acres of property in the Village of Chester, wanted to develop its property, which involved the consultation with municipal leaders from the Town and the Village. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 12:00 pm
Arcadia Holdings at Vista Ridge, LLC, 300 P.3d 1004 (Colo. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:27 am
Mecca contends that Trinitas offers competing services in an Ohio student-housing property using the name ANNEX and asserts that this use is likely to cause consumer confusion. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
Hope Development Corp. and Montrose VA Project, LLC asked the Town of Wallkill to provide water and sewer service to their property. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
And we doubt the company intended for its property to be discarded.)Finally, because it was unable to establish that Gittelman was motivated solely by “disinterested malevolence,” or that it had sustained special damages, the Learning Annex’s “prima facie tort claim” was also unmaintainable.It seems that, even for the Learning Annex, some lessons can only be learned the hard way.To download a copy of the Appellate… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm
Plaintiff BT Holdings, LLC, a Delaware corporation that owns approximately 68.4 acres of property in the Village of Chester, consulted with municipal leaders from the Town and the Village for purposes of developing their property The Village requested that Plaintiff petition to annex into the Village the portions of the Property that were in the Town. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
In 2004, Grand Bear Lodge, LLC purchased land near North Utica to develop a hotel, which North Utica then annexed. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 9:36 pm
BT Holdings, LLC (“BT”) purchased approximately 65 acres located in Chester, Orange County in the mid-80s. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:30 pm
In 2009, North Utica annexed tracts A and B into the village pursuant to an annexation agreement between Aramoni and North Utica. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:59 am
Sycamore, LLC v City Council of Iowa City, 2019 WL 3716364 (IA App. 8/7/2019) [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:47 pm
Evans Creek, LLC v City of Reno, 2021 WL 4173919 (D. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Plaintiff’s property had been annexed from the Town of Chester to the Village of Chester. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 6:36 am
Plaintiff’s property had been annexed from the Town of Chester to the Village of Chester. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
The operating agreement will state something to the effect that A,B and C each contributed x amount of money (or services or property) to the LLC and received membership interests in the percentages expressed on some annex to the operating agreement. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
Plainfield sent notice to Daum stating that he, on behalf of himself and his two businesses, Daum LLC and Daum Trucking, Inc., would have to pay a storm water fee of $182.00 per month starting on September 29, 2006, and that this amount would increase to $364.00 per month on January 1, 2007. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 4:13 am
Security Council resolution condemning the annexations. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:09 am
Calabro, who also owns and operates, through other LLCs, commercial and residential rental properties in at least Monroe and Cortland Counties. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 3:00 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:29 am
Articles 27 and 30 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, constituting Annex 1C to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO), signed at Marrakesh on 15 April 1994 and approved by Council Decision 94/800/EC of 22 December 1994 concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994) do not affect… [read post]
