Search for: "Any Test Franchising, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 253
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:19 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” Facts of the Case Petitioner Robyn Morgan worked as an hourly employee at a Taco Bell franchise owned by respondent Sundance, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:13 am by Joy Waltemath
The current Board disagreed with any suggestion that the Browning-Ferris test constitutes an appropriate way under common law to advance the statutory goal of promoting collective bargaining. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm by Steve Delchin
  Indeed, Dimora has stated famously that, “I have not done anything that any other public official hasn’t done. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:26 pm by Steve Delchin
  Indeed, Dimora has stated famously that, “I have not done anything that any other public official hasn’t done. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am by HRWatchdog
Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. that Dynamex is retroactive because the decision did not change any “settled rule” about what test applied to the Wage Orders and doing so is not “improper or unfair” to employers. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:07 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
In addition, the Massachusetts high court did not foreclose an effort by 7-Eleven to satisfy the strict ABC test in that state, and articulated a potential pathway for the franchise giant to ultimately prevail. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
At this point, I am finished, because TaxJEM, Inc. is small. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
[it] exceeds any that this judge has seen in his nineteen years on the bench. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The legal question is raises: are languages capable of copyright protection – on any level? [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
He was unaware of any entity not owned by the McFarland family that ever owned the Rex Chicken mark or franchise system. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 8:08 am
Beavers Inc., and Birg Inc., who owned the franchise, Globe Food Equipment, which supplied the “faulty meat slicer” and others were listed as defendants. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:13 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Under the policy, Lexington had the right and duty to defend Chicago Flameproof against any suit seeking covered damages, but no duty to defend against any suit seeking uncovered damages. [read post]