Search for: "Any Unknown Owners of Claimants"
Results 81 - 100
of 126
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2013, 11:04 am
If the names, residence or quantity of interest of any owner or claimant is unknown to plaintiff, this shall be stated. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:22 am
London Arbitration 15/13 The Claimants chartered the Vessel to the Respondents on an amended NYPE form. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 11:07 am
Any unauthorized reproduction or retransmission of this post is prohibited. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:18 am
Further, the £700 demand was quite unsupportable for many reasons: (i) an unknown percentage of its recipients would be non-infringers and (ii) the scale of any infringement was unknown. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:15 pm
Although the City is required to institute a civil forfeiture proceeding within 25 days after a "claimant" makes a formal demand for return of seized property that proceeding is commonly stayed until the conclusion of the underlying criminal action. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 11:32 am
It basically reverts to the old scheme where an unknown sub-subcontractor and virtually all suppliers have lien rights even if the owner or prime contractor does not know they are on the job. [read post]
30 May 2013, 6:19 am
Title insurance insures against already existing problems that are unknown or not properly researched. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:11 pm
Jurisdiction was obtained by seizure, attachment or lien because absent or unknown owners could not be personally served. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 7:06 am
Most auto insurance policies are going to include within the definition of "uninsured motor vehicle" a hit and run vehicle whose operator or owner cannot be identified. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
The Cancellation Division, in 2009, annulled the CTM registration, in relation to Classes 18 and 25, accepting the first plea brought by the claimant. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:00 am
Therefore, the claimant’s version was impossibly wrong as to a description of the building, the name of the restaurant, and the name of the owner, yet the Board ruled that SPK Restaurant, Inc. was the employer. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
In any event, the defendants clearly had received the papers and any failings had caused no prejudice.Secondly, it was said that the claim should not have been issued against “persons unknown” as the claimant knew the name of at least one defendant. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm
In any event, the defendants clearly had received the papers and any failings had caused no prejudice.Secondly, it was said that the claim should not have been issued against “persons unknown” as the claimant knew the name of at least one defendant. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:01 am
Sounds simple enough, but… Why should potential lien claimants be concerned? [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm
On both occasions, an injunction was issued prohibiting person or persons unknown from "disclosing any information concerning the book or dealing in any way with any copies of the book or disclosing any part of any copies they might have to any third parties . . .. [read post]
25 May 2012, 2:11 am
(ii) specified that any future claimants with claims arising from purported liens in the Assets could bring those claims against only the sale proceeds, and (iii) enjoined such future claimants from asserting those claims against the Assets or the Purchaser . . . . [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:16 am
The sheriff will then notify the owner or, if the owner is unknown, impound the cattle. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:15 am
The £700 demand was unsupportable for many reasons, including the facts that (i) an unknown percentage of its recipients would be non-infringers and (ii) the scale of any infringement was unknown. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
PINE LAKE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, Appellee. 4th District.Creditors' rights -- Foreign judgments -- Domestication -- In domesticating foreign judgment against husband, trial court did not err in entering summary judgment denying judgment creditor any lien on real property held by husband and wife -- Where conveyance to spouses did not contain any language expressly showing a contrary intent, tenancy by entireties was created -- Presumption is not rebuttable… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
Neither argument was accepted; the first had ‘no bearing on the arguments in this case’ and the second caused confusion given that the Lord Mayor and the Alderman and Guilds were Claimants (see Legal Bizzle’s post for more). [read post]
