Search for: "Apotex, Inc. "
Results 121 - 140
of 674
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
Disney Sues Over Musical Featuring 'Spider-Man,' 'Mary Poppins' and 'The Lion King' http://t.co/XAc2VLppHV -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-09-26: MPs attack Google's 'derisory' efforts to stop music and fil… http://t.co/HdZwYB8F4x -> Holding cellphone in hand while driving illegal in Ontario http://t.co/EKdj7ZR1JJ -> Apotex has no claim for unjust enrichment Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 6:45 am
Apotex, Inc. (06-1564) July 11, 2007 (non-precedential)Daiichi held a patent drawn to a method for treating bacterial ear infections by topically administering the antibiotic ofloxacin into the ear. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:55 am
Apotex,... [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
Apotex, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2012, 8:43 pm
Apotex, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:10 pm
These parties included Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 9:55 am
Apotex, Inc., 480 F.3d1348, 1364 (Fed. [read post]
22 May 2007, 12:22 pm
Apotex, Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff On Tuesday, the Federal Circuit sustained an injunction preventing generic drug maker Apotex, Inc. from selling a similar version of Amgen Inc's Neulasta drug without a 180 day notice period after being approved by the FDA. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 7:34 pm
Apotex, Inc. case, as well as activity in the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Apotex Inc., the Federal Circuit held that most claims of Alcon’s patent were obvious in view of prior art that suggested the use of the recited active agent to treat the recited condition, but not by the recited mechanism of action, because the prior art used a... [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 9:47 pm
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:31 am
Apotex, Inc., __ F.Supp.2d __, 2006 WL 2884317 (N.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 5:39 am
Apotex Inc.. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Apotex Inc., the Federal Circuit held that most claims of Alcon’s patent were obvious in view of prior art that suggested the use of the recited active agent to treat the recited condition, but not by the recited mechanism of action, because the prior art used a... [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:00 am
No settlement agreement by exchange of letters and emails Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 9:16 pm
Apotex Inc. et al. 1:08-cv-00827; filed February 7, 2008 in the Northern District of... [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:51 am
Apotex, Inc., 521 F.3d 523 (3rd CIr. 2008), a federal trial judge in Illinois has ruled that the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:00 am
Apotex Inc., the Federal Circuit held that most claims of Alcon’s patent were obvious in view of prior art that suggested the use of the recited active agent to treat the recited condition, but not by the recited mechanism of action, because the prior art used a... [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:55 pm
Apotex, Inc. [read post]
