Search for: "Apotex, Inc. " Results 161 - 180 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2020, 2:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome: Apotex, Inc. appeals from the judgment of the district court in a patent-infringement suit brought by Eli Lilly & Company under the Hatch-Waxman Act, 21 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
By Catherine Lemay -- Canada's Data Protection regime was upheld by the Federal Court of Appeal on December 9, 2010 (see Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Watson Laboratories, Inc.), the Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the Orange Book-listed patents for Lysteda®, but found that they were not infringed by either Apotex’s or Watson’s Abbreviated New Drug Applications... [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:43 am
Patents: Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2014] UKSC 55, [2014] 3 WLR 1257, [2014] WLR(D) 452, [2014] BUS LR 1217, UK Supreme Court In Everet v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Theodore Rand
Apotex, Inc., decided last week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 8:45 pm
Apotex Inc. et al.1:07-cv-00549; filed September 12, 2007 in the District Court of Delaware... [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:17 pm
Apotex, Inc. et al. 3:07-cv-04897; filed October 10, 2007 in the District... [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:19 pm
Apotex, Inc., No. 08-437, an implied preemption decision out of the Third Circuit involving an anti-depressant, pending the outcome of Wyeth. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 9:15 am by Theodore Rand
Apotex, Inc., decided last week, the Federal Circuit affirmed a district court finding of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:14 pm
ANDA Filing Not Violation of Express Terms of Injunction By Sherri Oslick -- In an opinion authored by Chief Judge Michel and issued late last week, the CAFC reversed the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, finding Apotex not to have violated an injunction prohibiting it... [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the District of Columbia’s April 2, 2010 order denying motions for preliminary injunction filed by Roxane Laboratories, Inc. and Apotex. [read post]