Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 21 - 40
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 9:50 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:00 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP (2008) __ Cal.4th __. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:20 pm
Raymond Edwards II was hired as a tax manager by Arthur Andersen LLP. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 6:20 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP (August 7, 2008) __ Cal.4th __. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Many, at best, pay lip service to the Arthur Andersen fee factors, or at least some of them. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:14 am
Here is the abstract: Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:16 am
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP V. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:10 pm
Arthur Andersen - read here -The Court flatly rejected the "limited" or "narrow" non-competition agreement as unlawful under Bus. and Prof. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 5:39 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, No. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:45 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:48 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 12:15 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937, 946 (2008). [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 5:57 pm
Arthur Andersen, discussed here. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 7:51 am
Arthur Andersen, LLP, 44 Cal.App. 4th 937 (2008) the California Supreme Court adopted an expansive interpretation of California Business & Professions Code §16600, holding that §16600 prohibits employee non-competition agreements unless the agreement falls within a statutory exception which are non-competition agreements associated with certain business sales transactions, dissolution of partnerships, or termination of a member’s interest in a limited… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, ruled that a provision in an employment agreement that prevented an employee from competing with his former employer following the termination of his employment was an invalid restraint on trade in violation of section 16600 of the California Business and Professions Code. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:21 am
In 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP collapsed in the wake of an obstruction of justice conviction. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Supreme Court decided this issue recently in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 10:03 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP, the California Supreme Court ruled on the following issues: (1) To what extent does Business and Professions Code section 16600 prohibit employee noncompetition agreements; and (2) is a contract provision requiring an employee to release “any and all” claims unlawful because it encompasses nonwaivable statutory protections, such as the employee indemnity protection of Labor Code section 2802? [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), reaffirmed that employee non-competition agreements are void in California unless they fall within narrow exceptions to Business and Professions Code Section 16600. [read post]
