Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 121 - 140
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2011, 11:04 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, 952, fn. 6.)) [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:32 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008), which rejected a “reasonableness” standard when applying Section 16600. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 2:20 pm
Arthur Andersen, LLP, the California Supreme Court rejected a "narrow restraint" rule which would have exempted restrictions that did not totally foreclose an employee from working in his chosen profession. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:01 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, Jamie Olis, and Jeffrey Skilling proceeded to trial after criminal charges were brought against them. [read post]
17 May 2017, 12:23 pm
’” In re Deepwater Horizon, 579 F App’x 256, 258 (5th Cir. 2014) (per curiam) (quoting Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:58 am
Bus, Credit v Peat Marnick Main & Co., 79 NY2d 695, 702 [I 9921; Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 65 NY2d 536 [ISSS]). [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:53 am
Bennett, a partner at Jones Day, discuss Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 11:13 pm
In addition to the Arthur Andersen case, KPMG LLP suffered a near-death experience last year due to its sale of improper tax shelters; federal prosecutors ultimately decided not to indict the firm, a move that likely would have put it out of business. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Arthur Andersen LLP (2008) 44 Cal.4th 937, to void the application of any noncompete agreement in an employment context, or any noncompete clause in an employment contract, no matter how narrowly tailored, that does not satisfy an exception in this chapter [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 19 Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:55 am
See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am
Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F.3d 1085 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm
See Arthur Andersen LLP v.United States, 544 U.S. 696, 705-08 (2005); United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 6:48 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, the California Supreme Court ruled previous workers are entitled to solicit the clients of former employers – assuming they don’t do so using their former employer’s trade secrets or confidential information while doing so. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm
” Of course, you should really consider them before doing the bad thing in the first place, so this is sort of a fallback position. 1 See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:33 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP specifically held that post-employment non-compete and customer non-solicitation provisions were disallowed under California law regardless of their scope or reasonableness. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:06 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP, 189 P.3d 285 (Cal. 2008); City of Oakland v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:42 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), the California Supreme Court confirmed the viability and breadth of section 16600 and expressly rejected a line of Ninth Circuit cases which had upheld sufficiently narrow restrictive covenants that only barred a party from pursuing a small or limited part of its business. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
Arthur Andersen LLP and void all employment noncompete agreements no matter how narrowly tailored. [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:46 pm
Strong, Non-signatories’ Right to Appeal the Denial of a Stay of Litigation: Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
